hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: REF: Pronounce Species Correctly

As our rather learned group has demonstrated there are several approaches to botanical pronunciation. When I was a graduate student in Botany my major professor insisted that I take two foreign languages. Latin was one he preferred, but I talked him out of it and took the computer language Fortran instead, since at the time I was calling myself a eco-systems analyst. (The then current buzz word for plant ecologist), so I am not the one to lay down any rules about Latin pronunciation. As I emphasized before, the current trend is to not insist on rules anyway, and to be very tolerant of pronunciations that reflect the region. I also believe the rules are somewhat different for those who trained at different institutions and at different times. One rule was that the accent should always be on the penultimate syllable. In that sense pseud AK corus  would be preferred over pseuda COR us. But I firmly believe that both are so prominently used that the rule in this case is meaningless.
 When usage becomes so common, the rules are trumped and either is acceptable. I do think it more elegant to try to pronounce names honoring people in such a way that they would recognize their name. Iris timofejewii was named after a general in the Russian Army. So I would assume that a Slavic pronunciation would be appropriate with the J more like a Y and the W more like a V for us. I am not sure that the ii is consistently applied but I would always say ee-eye for that ending. Zoological Latin has different rules than Botanical Latin. One huge difference is that botanical names never repeat the genus in the specific name, whereas you can have the North American mammal, Mephitus mephitus, but botanists think that stinks. In that case, so do zoologists. Stearns Botanical Latin is still the most prized reference in this field but pronunciation is local, temporal, and fickle. I dont believe it is ever really discussed at say the international convention of Botanists, although I know
 that there was a move by a group of botanists to abandon Latin and go to the language most people speak. Fortunately the Chinese lost the motion.

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement