hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: SPU: New botanical Iris name

In a message dated 2/25/05 9:49:33 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:

<<  For example, I have seen several informed publications listing spuria 
hybrids as I. spuria and Siberian hydrids as I sibirica which only serves to 
confuse an unknowing gardener.>>

Yes. It is everywhere. I think it is an attempt to grapple with the immensity 
and variability of the genus, although I will tell you frankly I am 
continually amazed at the level of ignorance about Irises generally in the professional 
worlds of horticulture, even science. I'm not saying folks don't grasp the 
finer points, I am saying it is sometimes really bad. 

For example, I wanted to review Mrs. Hollingworth's "Flower Chronicles" for 
my article on Iris persica. I decided to order a paperback of the recent 
reprint done by the University of Chicago press since it was said to have a new 
introduction by a noted botanist. And so it does, and the introduction, which I 
quote briefly for critical purposes, evoking the Fair Use provision of the 
copyright code, says "Both Iris germanica and some Arum species prefer damp marshy 

<<Botanists still have not confronted the Iris germanica>>

Germanica is a source of confusion to me. Now, I am entirely autodidact in 
all this, you understand, but I do like to try to understand things. 
Notwithstanding Linnaeus, Strabo, and all that jazz, I just don't think the germanica 
complex, so called, makes sense. Maybe it does on the microscope level but at the 
eyeball level there are some problems. As someone interested in the garden 
history of the Iris species, this is an issue for me.  
<<You chose the name I prefer for the grex. Unfortunately its asset may also 
be a problem. Iris  xspuriae uses the same spelling as the Series Spuriae and 
of course is made up of hybrids of this series. Unfortunately I am not 
positive it is allowable to use a series name as a x name.>>

Oh, well. rats. If not, I guess the xspurica is the next best? I don't care 
for the other if it can be avoided. Too many x's and i's...  

<< I have an e-mail in to one of the authors so I hope to get a clarification 
soon. I feel that I can press on such issues because I have no reputation to 

An enormously liberating position. Good luck with the query. Yours was a  
fascinating note, and I thank you for the time it took to share these 
thoughts with us. 


Anner Whitehead, in the throes of day three of a truly foul headcold. 
Richmond VA USA. 

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement