hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: HYB: registered rebloomers

In a message dated 2/5/2008 9:07:22 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
lmann@lock-net.com writes:

Loic,  maybe that's just year to year variability?  

And was there not some noise at one point about urging  more circumspection 
generally in denominating cultivars as  "rebloomers" so that the rail may, 
perhaps, now be perceived to  be somewhat higher than previously, viz a viz the 
normative expectations  ...or am I misremembering?
After all, one understands that gains are being made, and it  follows that 
the standard within the category must also be  evolving. Perhaps because, to the 
discriminating, some newer  rebloomers are better rebloomers, fewer lesser 
cultivars are perceived  to be worthy of introduction, so that whereas the 
quantities of  introductions are  more or less static, the overall quality of the  
introductions is higher.
Anner Whitehead
Richmond VA USA USDA

**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.     

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement