hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive


Arnold Koekkoek wrote:
> I want to speak up on behalf of SS, since it seems to have drawn its
> share of "doesn't work here" comments from Tenn. and NC.  Here in NW
> Iowa, NE Neb, at least in the several gardens where I've seen it,
> including my own, SS is a stunner.  It grows as it's supposed to,
> stands up well despite those huge flowers, and increases moderately
> well.  The bloom stalks are as big and fat as any I've ever seen,
> and they don't fall over.  I've had it for at least 5 years, and I
> would definitely not want to part with it.

I guess I better put my 2 cents in and say that Supreme Sultan does well
here in Central California.  I have grown it for about 6 years and each
year it grows and does well.  Flowers are not huge (not as large as
Little Much) but large and the stalks never fall over.   

Rick Tasco
Central California
Zone 8

Rick Tasco
Central California
Zone 8

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index