hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Rebloomers - Diploids and MTB's (oops!!!)

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: Re: Rebloomers - Diploids and MTB's (oops!!!)
  • From: CEMahan@aol.com
  • Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 14:26:27 -0700 (MST)

In a message dated 97-02-16 13:28:50 EST, you write:

<< Should have written... Lady Emma's morphology puts it more comfortably in
 the ***MTB*** class although there has been lively discussion on just where
 it should be classified. >>

Several authorities would say you were right the first time, Mike!  And as
for me, well, if it doesn't fit into the MTB standards, and blooms in the
spring with the IBs, it's and IB or a BB. Clarence Mahan in VA,
CEMahan@aol.com





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index