hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: light intensities and latitude

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: Re: light intensities and latitude
  • From: "Jeff and Carolyn Walters" <cwalters@cache.net>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 09:22:17 -0700 (MST)

Hi Celia!
     You wrote (Fri, 21 Feb 97):
----------
> 
> I haven't yet seen latitude discussed here as a factor to consider when
> shopping for iris sources, and I wonder if it should be.
> 
> NPR reported recently that a film student took a light meter reading out
of
> doors at noon on a clear, sunny day in New York, NY, and came up with a
> reading of 300-and- some-odd candle feet. The same week, a film student
in
> Los Angeles also took a light meter reading outside on a clear sunny day,
> and his clocked 700-and-something candle feet. (Sorry I don't recall the
> exact data, I was driving.) NYC is located at 40 degrees, 43 minutes N;
LA
> sits at 34 degrees, 4 minutes N.
> This is a monster difference in light intensity, especially for living
> things whose food production depends upon how well they absorb and employ
> light energy.
> 
> Although it's a perfectly logical observation, I had not considered how
> dramatically different light *intensity* (not merely duration) might be
in
> different regions.

In addition to latitude, I would think that atmospheric conditions (cloudy
or clear) and altitude would have to be considered in this connection.

Jeff Walters in northern Utah (Zone 4)
cwalters@cache.net
"This is the Place" -plenty of sun, but not enough heat at the moment





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index