Re: FUCK U!!
I think that was totally crude and rude. Children could be reading
>From email@example.com Mon Feb 9 05:36:07 1998
>Received: from news (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by news.Rt66.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA23600;
> Mon, 9 Feb 1998 06:34:45 -0700 (MST)
>Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 06:34:45 -0700 (MST)
>From: The Hiltibidals <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: FUCK U!!
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Comment: Discussion on garden irises
>I can't imagine the mind that would go to so much trouble for such a
>Clearly they need some garden therapy.
>At 06:24 AM 2/9/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>i beleive this is a spam, if you'll notice the sender, Guo Rong, that
>>be pronounced: Go Wrong.
>>>Guo Rong <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com