hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: recessive amoenas

>Juri Pirogov wrote:
>> ----------
>> > Nr: J. Griffin Crump <jgcrump@erols.com>
>> > D`r`: 15 tebp`k=7F 1998 c. 3:42
>> >
>> > Wills, writing in 1946, was almost certainly describing the difficulty
>> > of working with recessive amoenas, since Paul Cook's dominant amoenas
>> > were not introduced until the 1950's.
>> >
>> Griff,
>> do you know, if were remarkable recessive amoenas introduced after domina=
>> ones appeared?
>> Juri
>> jukp@aha.ru
>Juri -- I am not an authority on this, but am not aware of any after
>TRUDY (Tompkins, R. '64). You might want to review the thread on WABASH
>and recessive amoenas last January and February in the Archives.
>Griff Crump, along the tidal Potomac near Mount Vernon, VA
 Lloyd Zurbrigg  We should ceertainly mention Barry Blyth of Australia, who
has been working the recessive amoenas for many years. There have been many
comments fairly recently about these.  Griff; I was surprised to learn of
your work in this field. A difficult field indeed!. L Z in Durham NC

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index