hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: CULT: How do you feel about...

  • Subject: Re: [iris] CULT: How do you feel about...
  • From: "Patrick Orr" irisdude@msn.com
  • Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 00:17:51 -0700
  • List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
  • Seal-send-time: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 00:17:51 -0700

I am a amateur pollen-dauber and collector of iris.  As Debbie wrote, it IS
more convenient for me to plant iris in rows and keep iris separate...even
though I have roses and a daylily in one of my beds.

I want to stress, however, that gardeners should do what they want.  Nobody
SHOULD grow irises any certain way.  Even some iris breeders I know plant iris
among other plants instead of in rows.

The important thing is that you enjoy the irises, no matter HOW you grow them,
and there is no right or wrong way to do it.

I have heard some say that if you are serious about growing irises, that you
keep them separate.  I say PISHAW to them!  That is simply not true, and
nobody should be made to feel bad about growing them differently from someone
else.  Do what you like and enjoy!

Happy New Year!

Patrick Orr
Phoenix, AZ  Zone 9

Debby wrote:

>I agree. Iris breeders and collectors find it more convenient to plant in
>rows and keep Iris separate - and that's fine and totally logical for their
>purposes.  But for those of us who just love them and want to have them in
>our gardens, "IN" is the operative word.
>Mine are planted (in various areas) in amongst or next to Scabiosia, Lupine,
>Daylilies, Shasta Daisys, Dianthus, Violas, Roses, Oriental Poppies,
>Siberian Iris, Periwinkle, Asiatic Lilies, Columbine etc.
>I adore Iris, they are definitely my favourite plant, but if they had to be
>babied to the extent that I had to keep them apart from other plants or they
>wouldn't survive - then where's the pleasure in having them? The joy would
>be gone. And they are truly a joy.
>>I am always amused by the idea that Irises are supposed to be garden
>plants. It seems most people grow them in collections ( corn rows) which is
>fine. I am a collector myself and this is the easiest way to maintain a
>large collection. But that is not what I call a garden. If we never grow any
>other plants with Irises how can we call them garden plants and how can they
>be judged as such?
>To sign-off this list, send email to
majordomo@hort.net<mailto:majordomo@hort.net> with the
>message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

To sign-off this list, send email to
majordomo@hort.net<mailto:majordomo@hort.net> with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement