hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive


Betty et al., it is amazing to me how our perceptions--and our standards--have
changed since I first encountered irises.

I thought Lent A. Williamson beautiful--those wonderful and intricate colors
in the hafts fascinated me.  Then when I got Shah Jehan and later
Extravaganza, I was in ecstasy with the colors.  Eventually I was taught that
colorfully patterned hafts were "bad."

Funny thing is, now I find the form and pattern like those showing up on
Iris-photos fascinating too.  A few decades ago the big deal was to get rid of
"messy" hafts.  Super clean color--evenly applied.  Now, in the post-Blyth
blitz, all the rage is butterfly wing - veined upper falls that would have
gone on the compost heap right fast a generation ago, and still do unless
there is something really appealing about the flower.  That still happens here
in my small breeder's patch, as I haven't shaken the "messy hafts" bias yet,
at least not entirely.  Give me a decade or so to adapt.

I love those very wide-hafted forms with shorter standards, ruffled falls that
cup.  I find those exquisite.  Since I was at one time over 6', I could look
down on a 40" iris and enjoy the view from above.  Now that I'm shrinking and
my spine isn't as straight as it once was, I appreciate a view from somewhat
lower--but still a long ways above the flower on all but some outrageously
tall ones.

I appreciate "balance," but balance is a subjective thing, not a matter of

We seem to go by fads. The day of the stiff, starched tailored iris may yet
return.  There are some wonderfully beautiful MTB's that have this, and I
think they are charming.  There was a time when that form was the norm in TB's
too.  That's a long time gone--now <everything> has ruffles, and the more, the
"better."  Is it better?  Not for everybody!

Diversity and diversity of tastes has a lot of merit, I think.  We're not
stamped out with a cookie cutter, nor should our irises be IMHO (actually not
"humble" at all!).

Neil Mogensen  z 7  western NC mountains

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement