hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: CULT:Decadence grows for me in z 5 Michigan
iris@hort.net
  • Subject: Re: CULT:Decadence grows for me in z 5 Michigan
  • From: Michelle Verville <flowrgirl1@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:01:26 -0800 (PST)

I guess I will see what this spring will bring.  Such weird winter weather
this year!  Decadence was beautiful last summer!  I wouldn't say it's the
strongest grower but it definitely has improved over the last few years.
Michelle Verville
 
 

________________________________
 From: Adam Cordes
<adambo_iris@yahoo.com>
To: iris@hort.net 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012
11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [iris]CULT:Decadence grows for me in z 5 Michigan
  
Hi
Michelle! 

Thanks for mentioning that.  I'm especially glad to hear you've
had it
blooming for consecutive seasons!  Good news, indeed.

Adam ~  in
Michigan, too.



--- On Mon, 1/16/12, Michelle Verville
<flowrgirl1@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Michelle Verville <flowrgirl1@yahoo.com>
Subject: [iris]CULT:Decadence grows for me in z 5 Michigan
To: "iris@hort.net"
<iris@hort.net>
Date: Monday, January 16, 2012, 9:44 AM

Seeing the discussion
about Decadence, I just wanted to let everyone know
that
I live in zone 5,
Michigan with 150 to 200 inches of snow and 30 plus inches
of rainfall
annually and so far so good with Decadence.  I have had  it 3 or
four years
now.  It has increased  and bloomed the last few years.  Last
summer it was
beautiful!  Fingers crossed.


Michelle Verville
________________________________
From: Betty Wilkerson <autmirislvr@aol.com>
To: iris@hort.net
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject:
[iris]CULT:poor performing irises.(was Daring Deception)

<<Hi Betty
Wilkerson
and all iris talk participants,>>

In response:

There will always
be some
irises that do not prosper in all gardens. This is not the first time
this
subject has created tension among the iris talk listers. It is clear we
can
not publicly discuss this subject.

Just for the record, I have nothing
negative to say about anyone. Eugene, I was not addressing my comment to you.
Ibm sorry if you took it that way. I have great respect for those who choose
to remove poor performing irises from their gardens. Why not? The space can
be
better utilized with other cultivars. It just seems we can not mention those
cultivars by name without creating controversy.

If I were just collecting and
showing irises, my buying pattern would be different. There is a good chance
I
would simply pass up anything I thought might be a problem, just as I once
did. Do I wish there was some way I could know in advance if an iris will
prosper in my garden? Sure I do. I donbt really like wasting money.
Personally, Ibve spent a lot of time in the iris register and Ibve got a
pretty good idea of what I can expect from a given iris, even before I pay my
money for it. Sometimes Ibm wrong. Sometimes Ibm wrong in a good way. After
serious consideration, I determined that the only way I can get genes I want
into my irises is to take a few chances.

Many hybridizers have passed through
Region 7 in the past 25+ years and I learned something from most of them.
Ibve
long admired the work of many hybridizers, including Joe Ghio, Keith Keppel,
&
Barry Blyth. They are fine people and giving of their time and ideas. The
same
was true of Ben Hager, Monty Byers, Dr. Zurbrigg, Dr. R. Smith and others
Ibve
been in contact with throughout the past 25 years. Though I must say Ibm
extra
fond of Dr. Raymond Smith!

NOTE: This is a general statement and not focused
on any particular list member.



Betty Wilkerson
Zone 6 KY
autmirislvr@aol.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Eugene Baxley
<baxleyeugene@yahoo.com>
To: iris <iris@hort.net>
Sent: Sat, Jan 14, 2012 6:15
pm
Subject: [iris] Daring Deception


Hi Betty Wilkerson and all iris talk
participants,
I cannot speak for
anyone else about what would happen to any
particular iris that is competing
for the Dykes medal.
I can however speak for
myself. If I purchase Daring
Deception and it does well or semi well in my
garden, I would have no
objection to it's award of the Dykes medal. Some
others where it did not do
well might object to the award. I did not object to
Decadence based upon
geographic origin and I don't think I will object to any
iris based on
geographic origin in the future. A good iris is a good iris
wherever it's
origin. I objected to Decadence based upon it's nonperformance
here in my
garden. Many people responded in the negative when asked if
Decadence did well
for them.
I think the rules for AIS awards needs to be
revised, not to
keep foreign iris out of the competition, but to help insure
that the
candidates perform well in a large majority of US gardens when
competeing for
the Wister medal and the Dykes medal. To that end I believe
competitors for
the Wister Medal and the Dykes medal should be required to
garner a plurality
of votes cast in at least seventy-five per cent of the AIS
regions then they
should be required to have received a plurality of the sum
of all votes cast
by the regions. And I believe judges should be required to
have had the Wister
and/or the Dykes candidate in their garden for two years
or be barred from
voting for it. It is my belief that many judges vote from
photographs or from
the bloom only that they have seen in a tour garden or
other garden. About
this latter I may be wrong and to all whom I may have
offended, I am sorry if
I am wrong.
This would not insure that a nonperforming
iris would not be
selected, but it might help. There are other theories about
that might work.
With this I have had my say and I have only one other thing
to do related
to this subject and that is to write a letter to Judy Keisling
in as
nonoffending way as I can to relay my feelings on the matter. As one
person
said, "It comes up about every two years and nothing is ever done about
it".
Nothing will be done this time if AIS is not informed of your feelings.
Making poorly performing iris Dykes medal winners does definitely cause
loss
of membership in the AIS. Young people are very disallusioned when an
iris
that has gotten the highest award we offer is a flop in their garden.
Many
dirft away.

E. Baxley
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text
UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text
UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text
UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text
UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement