hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: REF: Journals


From: "John Montgomery" <monashee@junction.net>

Ian wrote:
> 
> Everyone's view of the world is different and the discussion about the
> weakness of AIS is, in my view, reflected in the Bulletin.  It is well
> produced and edited but simply lacks interesting articles.  Now, if
> SIGNA could be published like the AIS Bulletin, we would be getting
> somewhere.
> 

I am not sure that I agree with this statement.  As a sometimes, 
emergency editor for the NALS QB, one of the cautions which I 
always received and which I consider to be valid, was to always 
remember that for any given issue, there will be both beginner and 
experienced readers. It is very tempting to try to fill each issue with 
advanced material. If the editor does that, the probability is that a 
great many new members will fail to renew. 

This problem is made more difficult in the AIS Bulletin due to the 
great differences between the divisions. The specialist arilbred 
grower will not likely be excited by an in depth paper on bulbous 
iris and vice versa. It seems to me that the place for most of the 
highly technical papers in in the publications of the various 
sections. This is well done by the Species, Historic and Aril 
sections among others.

Bill Shear talked of the clutter of administrative stuff in each issue. I 
agree and there is a solution. I once belonged to the Amer. Rock 
garden Soc. and their Quarterly, at that time at least, was entirely 
devoted to plants. All of the minutes and other such material was 
printed on as a separate leaflet, folded but unbound. The member 
had the choice to file this information or destroy as desired. It 
seems to me that this procedure would reduce printing costs and 
really clean up the Quarterly.

John Montgomery
monashee@junction.net
Vernon  BC  Zone 5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index