hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: CAT: accuracy of Schriener's

From: Vicki Craig <craigiris@earthlink.net>


I do so dislike seeing reports on such things made "second hand".  If this
had been your personal experience, i.e. you ordered and received a
mislabeled plant..and you feel that it is in the best interest of all to
talk about it, that is one thing. But to say that someone else had that
experience is what I consider gossip. Maybe that someone was mistaken about
the source.
Let's try to talk about our personal experiences, Okay.

See subject line. Schreiner's is the correct spelling.  We all make errors.


To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index