hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: cameras..

On June 27, 2001 06:42 pm, you wrote:

> you can get good prints with the right film , if you take the time to learn
> how, it's not that hard..

	I don't think anybody is going to argue film doesn't produce higher quality 
work. BTW if anybody wants to get me one of those hasslebads for Christmas 
that would be okay-) But I'd wager most of the people looking at digital 
cameras are looking to produce output for computer use only. That means 
email,websites or just personally on the computer. How many websites make use 
of the higher quality that a good quality film camera can produce? Rolls 
Royce is a better car but if all you do is drive to the corner store it's 

	IMHO digital cameras aren't really replacing SLRs but are replacing all the 
more or less throw away cameras every home has or had.



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index