hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: RE: HYB: Substance


Well, Linda, you've reminded me that one of the irises in my garden with
best substance is SCHIAPARELLI (Moldovan '74).  For that matter, I think it
was a great iris that was ahead of its time, a pink self with a hot pink
beard.   Interestingly, LENORA PEARL (Nichols '88) is almost
indistinguishable from it in my garden, not having the salmon-pink cast that
it apparently has in its developer's garden.

I also have a seedling, LUCY'S CHARM (R. '97), that has great substance and
will hold a bloom for 5 days.  It's a blend, however, and "them that prefer
it are few", to paraphrase the song.

As to what "substance" means, I consider it to mean a bloom that is
resilient to the touch and doesn't become translucent or droop in the rain.
I would put GYRO, BRAVE NEW WORLD, AURA LIGHT and KNIGHTED in this category,
but there are many more.  --  Griff

zone 7 in Virginia


----- Original Message -----
From: "Linda Mann" <lmann@volfirst.net>
To: "iris- talk" <iris@hort.net>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 2:04 PM
Subject: [iris] RE: HYB: Substance


> PINK FORMAL (an even older historic - Muhlenstein '49) also has better
> substance than a lot of modern intros.  Schreiner's 60s catalog says
> 'extra heavy substance that holds in the hottest sun'.  Form is not good
> here - sort of crunched looking.  But it is remarkably fertile both ways
> here and capable of carrying pods through the summer slop.  Bee
> seedlings had good substance.
>
> Just for fun (and to annoy KK?), I put some PF pollen on HAPPENSTANCE
> this year - H didn't have any pollen, or I would have made the cross the
> other way.  The stalk rotted out from under the pod and the pod rotted
> at about 6 weeks.  But the seeds look like some <might> be mature
> enough.
>
> Good pods on PF from BETTY DUNN, and might have a few surviving
> seedlings from last year's cross of PF X C SONG big enough to bloom next
> spring. Or this fall (I wish!).
>
> Glad you asked this one Betty - I don't have much of anything with
> really super substance to work with yet.
>
> < An older historic - WEBSPUN (Craig '68) - surprised me by having
> superior
> substance compared to even most modern intros. Donald Eaves  Texas Zone
> 7b, USA>
>
> --
> Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8
> East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.korrnet.org/etis>
> American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org>
> talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/>
> photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/>
> online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement