hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Invasive pseudo


> Likewise purple loosestrife.  A person on the internet with whom I was
> exchanging postings said that purple loosestrife is not invasive in the 
> south.  Is that true??

NO!  In this month's *Virginia Wildlife" magazine there is an article on 
invasive plants and purple loosestrife is one of the most menacing 
invasive plants in the state.
> My contention is that purple loosestrife is such a menace here in the north
> -- it is almost devestating bird sanctuaries -- is NOT the garden variety
> and therefore neither should be used in gardens to avoid confusing passersby
> who go to swamps and dig the awful kind.  What are your comments?

I've become convinced it should never be planted in most of the US--even 
the supposedly "sterile" garden varieties are thought to facilitate the 
spread of the plant.  Don't buy it!  Pull it out if you have it.  
Encourage your state to invest in eradication programs before valuable 
habitat and native species are lost!

Debbie Green
Williamsburg, VA (USDA Zone 7/8)

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index