hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

REB: Smith vs Gibson vs G.P. Brown genes

  • Subject: REB: Smith vs Gibson vs G.P. Brown genes
  • From: Linda Mann <lmann@volfirst.net>
  • Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 16:10:07 -0400

It seems like rebloomers with G.P.Brown rebloomer background (several
Zurbrigg irises) are more reliable, less likely to stunt, more likely to
bloom, more likely to be pod & pollen fertile, and more likely to thrive
here than rebloomers with Smith (PURPLE DUET, BLACK DUET) or Gibson
(GIBSON GIRL?) backgrounds.

Comments, observations from others?

Are there other major progenitor hybridizers of rebloom genes?

Seems like I remember somebody saying RAMESES and I. reichenbachii were
thought to carry rebloom.....

Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index