hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: CULT:Ugly Irises

  • Subject: Re: [iris-talk] Re: CULT:Ugly Irises
  • From: "wmoores" <wmoores@watervalley.net>
  • Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 21:19:10 -0500
  • Content-description: Mail message body
  • Priority: normal

Al, I am glad that you saw the humor in this thread!  Everybody has 
a different opinion, and 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder.'  I am 
sure your wife made a good choice, too.

Walter Moores
Enid Lake, MS 7/8

On 28 May 2002 at 0:56, albee703 wrote:

> Three of them are on my wish list, Walta. My wife always told me I had
> good taste in women and irises. Now you've raised some doubt in my
> mind. One out of two isn't shabby.
> Al Bullock
> No Va

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index