hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re:CULT:Last Men Standing

  • Subject: Re: [iris-talk] Re:CULT:Last Men Standing
  • From: oneofcultivars@aol.com
  • Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 23:38:43 EDT

In a message dated 5/29/2002 9:25:59 PM Central Daylight Time, 
ddbro@llano.net writes:

> According to my records all of them except Hollywood Nights have bloomed
> every year that I have had them and I just acquired Hollywood Nights last
> year so will have to see on it.  What does that tell you?  I can't guess
> where this thread is leading?

I have a suspicion (the more intelligent may call it a hypothesis) that 
aberrant behavior with late bloom may be an indication of a dormant rebloom 

Curiosity is the bane of cats and hybridizers,
Bill Burleson

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index