hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: AIS: registration, out of class


Yes, Leroy Meininger had to change his class on Leanna (I think that was
the one), it was born and registered in Nebraska where it always was the
correct hight for BB. When he sent it to us in California to grow for him
it has never got below TB size. Go Figure!! lorraine in Modesto CA

Linda Mann wrote:

> BATIK was mentioned as consistently growing taller than its size class
> in some parts of the country.  We had a very tall stalk of BATIK in our
> show this year also.  Taller than many of the TB stalks on the table.
> So tall that one of the judges questioned the identity, but the other
> two assured him that is normal for BATIK.  They did move it to the BB
> table.
>
> ==Who determines whether or not a registered iris is actually in the
> correct class?  Isn't the hybridizer or introducer responsible for
> measuring the height?  Surely all new irises aren't sent to Mississippi
> prior to registration to make sure they aren't going to grow out of
> class <g>
>
> It sounds like BATIK would have been registered as a TB if it had been
> born in this part of the country.
>
> I've noticed that some TBs are registered with a range of heights -
> i.e., 35 to 37 inches.  Maybe it should have been registered with a
> height range of 24 to 36 inches, as a BB/TB.
>
> ==After the iris is widely distributed and it becomes known that the
> registration is incorrect concerning class, is the registration ever
> changed?
>
> --
> Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8
> East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.korrnet.org/etis>
> American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org>
> talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/>
> photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/>
> online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index