hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: COMP: 59 or 2000,2001 and 2002

In a message dated 5/6/2004 11:08:12 AM Central Daylight Time, 
jijones@usjoneses.com writes:
Which is more important the '59 Checklist or the 2000,2001 and 2002 
R&Is ?
The later ones are more important!!  

Thanks for all the work John and I agree that $10 is a bargain to be able to 
find parents, descriptions etc-for hybridizers, sales activities, auction 
chairs, just filling out your own personal database of what you have!  

I truly think the database will not affect the R&I book sales (I need both) 
but it sure saves time to be able to do cut-n-paste onto an auction list-maybe 
one day we'll even have the pics to go with them!

Rita Gormley
Gormley Greenery
Cedar Hill, MO
AIS Region 18, Zone 5

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement