hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive


At 10:42 PM 4/30/96 MDT, you wrote:
>Hey, great idea! Many of the accepted terms were created just this way.
>Somebody dreams up something and no one has a better idea! (Look at
>aurata, glaciata, and even luminata itself--though it's now a venerable
>I like 'umbra' ('umbral' would be the adjective)--or if you want to be
>parallel with plicata, luminata, etc., it could be 'umbrata' (which means
>"shaded"--not bad, heh?).
 Could somebody explain what a luminata is and the genetics of it? I asked
Joe Ghio to expain it and as he took me around his seedling patch he would
say this or that is an illuminata then look closer and change his mind. So I
am more in the dark than before. I am under the impression that the
illuminata pattern is a recessive (very recessive) trait of plicata's. I
read a AIS bulletin about this breeding pattern but feel that I am still in
the dark about what exactly it looks like. Could you give a few examples?
Karin Hinsen  seconfid@mtnweb.com
Central coast of California

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index