hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: SHOW: Queen Criteria

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: Re: SHOW: Queen Criteria
  • From: "william b. cook" <billc@atlantic.net>
  • Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 21:33:18 -0600 (MDT)

> "This does not suggest that only the latest introduction can qualify for
> the honor, but an older variety of obviously outdated features should not
> be selected even if the entry is an excellent specimen for the variety".
> 
     I think this has been discussed before, but I still think that the
above rule should be scrapped.  The entry most near to perfection for the
variety should win no matter what type it is or the year it was introduced.
 

Mark A. Cook
billc@atlantic.net
Dunnellon, Florida.  





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index