hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Proposed Experiment

Hi Sharon:

I have always love the arilbreds for the round globular forms and large
signals.  If I had ever lived in an area where I could have grown them I
would  have bred for that beautiful form and signal in all colors. 

<<  I have often been asked why the rules were changed so that 1/8-breds were
no longer considered arilbreds and have given the usual explanation about not
having enough aril  characteristics. >>

I would maintain the classic form and unusual colorations of the arilbred and
move it into the reblooming tall bearded iris for more bloom and the TB for
wider adaptability.  That would be something.  Forget the rules.  A beautiful
and easy to grow iris can stand on its own without some classification rule.
 The late Tom Craig was working in this field.

Robert Turley

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index