hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: HIST: "Cuba" and the Confirmation of Identity

From: waddie <waddie@slip.net>

Thanx Anner,

I am a member of HIPS.  I gues now it is a waiting game.  I will be in touch when
there is more to discuss.


HIPSource@aol.com wrote:

> From: HIPSource@aol.com
> In a message dated 11/10/99 9:35:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, waddie@slip.net
> writes:
> <<  The lady that gave me Cube says that it's definitely *not* Cuba Libre.
> She
>  says it's " bi-color blue purple".  Does this sound like the original Cuba?>>
> Let us look at the situation a bit more closely.
> The full Check List entry on this iris is:
> *CUBA . DB-B3L (Sheets. N.); R., 1931; (SCHNEEKUPPE X VERDUN)
> It tells us that the iris in question was a Dwarf, and that it was a light
> blue toned bicolor or bitone without a pronounced red cast.The parents as
> listed are a white dwarf and a deep blue dwarf, so there is no compelling
> reason to doubt the description. It also tells us that the iris was
> registered in 1931 by Earl Wooddell Sheets of Washington, D.C.,  who issued
> catalogs in 1928 and 1929 and died in 1935. The asterix indicates that in
> 1939 the "variety" was "obsolete".
> The term "obsolete" means (AISCL39, p. 3) that the iris was "not listed any
> more in catalogs", which does not necessarily mean extinct. This status is
> not surprizing since CUBA was "registered" but never "introduced," which
> means introduced into commerce. That is what the "N" means after Sheets name
> in the entry. The 1949 Check List reiterates this obsolete status, and does
> not show the name having been given to another later iris, which has also
> been known to happen.
> And this extrapolation presupposes that all the info in the Check List is
> complete and correct.
> CUBA's not having been introduced also means that no contemporary catalog
> descriptions are likely be found to note defining traits of the plant, which
> would also make identification difficult. Possibly there might be some
> mention in the earlier AIS Bulletins or other documents, which would involve
> someone digging through them.
> I'd personally say it was a long shot that this is CUBA. Not impossible, for
> Sheets might have sent a start to someone for evaluation at some point, but a
> long shot.
> The first thing you should do is look at the plant and if it is not a
> dwarf--- which could conceivably mean something a bit larger than what we
> mean by the term today but certainly something considerably smaller than a
> TB--then the question is settled.
> If it is "dwarf "and blooms something that could conceivably be called light
> blue then further examination may be possible, although it is unlikely that
> even if this is real that a firm identification can be made since the only
> way this generally happens is by side by side comparison of the mystery plant
> and a named plant of undisputed provenance. That is, it matches in all
> details one that has been grown under its own name for many years and can be
> traced back to the original introducer.
> If it meets both size and color tests it may be useful to pursue the matter
> further.
> As a benefit of membership, the Historic Iris Preservation Society offers the
> assistance of our ID Chairman in these matters. The usual procedure is that
> the member grows the iris in question and at bloom time compiles a full and
> detailed description of the plant and all its parts, including what is known
> of the actual history of the individual clone in question, and a set of
> photos shot according to the formula on the HIPS page. This is sent to the ID
> Chairman who examines it all and gives the matter thought. Sometimes the iris
> in question is something he has seen so many times before he can ID it right
> off the bat. Sometimes requests a rhizome to be sent to him to be grown on
> for comparison if he thinks it will shed light on the matter. Then in the
> fullness of time, and these things can take a good deal of time, some answers
> may come. He may be able to make a tentative identification, or offer some
> impressions as to probable origins and dates, or tell you what your iris is
> not. The more distinctive the plant the easier it is to do all this.
> Blue and purple bitones are typically difficult to ID since there are so many
> of them.
> Everyone enjoys speculating about unknowns and HIPS does not wish to spoil
> anyone's fun, or harp about this but we really feel it is best to be very
> conservative about assigning firm names to unknowns. You see, we spend a lot
> of time cleaning up messes and confusion caused by iris names having gotten
> screwed up somewhere along the line.
> Information on the mission of HIPS and the many benefits of HIPS membership,
> which costs five dollars a year, is found on the HIPS page at:
> http://www.worldiris.com.
> Anner Whitehead
> Commercial Source Chairman
> Historic Iris Preservation Society
> HIPSource@aol.com

--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------

       ~ FREE Games & CA$H Prizes!  ~  $55,000+ Awarded Monthly ~ 
Welcome to Gamesville.com-- Home of the World's Biggest & Best Free Games
  Play Three-Eyed Bingo, Quick-Draw Poker, Pop Quiz & Picturama  FREE! 
   <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/gamesville5 ">Click Here</a>


 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index