hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: REB: rebloom seedlings
  • Subject: Re: Re: REB: rebloom seedlings
  • From: Linda Mann <101l@rewrite.hort.net>
  • Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 08:53:22 -0400

Which assumes that is possible/easy. Easy to use the former, but I got nowhere trying to do the latter <here> because they wouldn't produce viable pollen.

The "most productive choices" needs the caveat of "for your breeding conditions".

It's like the advice I was getting when I first started breeding - use the best irises you can afford. Which are those same irises that don't do well in my climate (i.e., some Dykes medal winners won't live here). I still get asked why I'm using such old irises (i.e., Immortality) for breeding purposes - they are the very 'best' for my goals in my growing conditions.

It's one thing to say "don't expect to get mediterranean/coastal/CA/OZ" style rebloom the first generation using those irises for breeding in your climate if it's not 'medit/coast/etc', but I think it's very misleading to tell new rebloom breeders not to use them because it isn't the "most productive choice".

That's a judgement call that has to be made by the hybridizer.

I'm not trying to argue about your proposed genetic types of rebloom - you certainly have more years of experience with that than I do. Unfortunately, phenotypic expression of rebloom in different climates only gives clues, not verification of presence or absence of those genes. I don't like your assumption that all 'sporadic/mediterranean etc' expression of rebloom = proof of the presence of one type of rebloom gene.

i.e., my 'bet' is that it isn't always just one type ;-)

On 10/6/2014 7:57 AM, Chuck Chapman wrote:
And that is using rebloomers  in your climate that are reliable and
consistent with the  iris  that in your climate that have best
secondary  rebloom characteristics.

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement