hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Judging

On Sun, 19 Oct 1997 Henryanner@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 97-10-19 12:57:38 EDT, you write:
> << One can agree or disagree with Anner but she entirely missed the point
>  that I was making.  >>
> Ian, I would like to endorse Tasco's idea that you write up your thoughts and
> send them along to the Committee addressing reform in the judging system.
> Perhaps they will be able to grasp the subtleties. I believe Griff has
> explained the situation accurately and I have exhausted my interest in the
> question.
> Anner Whitehead, Richmond, Va 
> Henry Hall, henryanner@oal.com
	I agree with Rick and Anner about writing your thoughts to the
revision committee that is currently working on the JT handbook.  This
subject has been worked to death, and I, too 'have exhausted my interest
in the question.'

	Walter Moores
	Enid Lake, MS 7/8

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index