hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: OT: El Nino

Dear Editor:

I have been following the news reports on the projected impact of the El
Niqo. I really became curious when a recent article quoted some
"experts" as projecting the increased rainfall to be on the order of two
to three times seasonal norms. When I looked up the thirty year seasonal
average for the Bay Area I found a figure of about twenty inches for San
Francisco. If the Bay Area receives an additional twenty to forty inches
more than the seasonal average we should forget sandbags and start
building arks.

For what it is worth, other projections that I found on the internet
offered that we might get from two to three centimeters to six to eight
inches more than the thirty year seasonal average. One of those
projections offered that the Gulf Coast would be harder hit than the
Pacific Coast.

While there is a need to prepare people for this event, there is no need
to panic them. After all, two to three centimeters is a far cry from
twenty to forty inches. We have to get the stories straight or the
reporting straight.

Al Limberg
Concord, CA

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index