hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Judging

I'm ad libbing this since my girlfriend raided my email account to check
if she had any mail, and used the old mail program to do so. 

Griff wrote:

> Having a "People's Choice" vote at shows just might be 
> for irisarians. The public, unaware of the criteria used quite
> legitimately by the judges, might give us some valuable information
> simply by informing us, through their choices (1st, 2d and 3d, 
> perhaps?)
> of what they like, PARTICULARLY if it differs from the judges'
> selections. Fads, after all, usually begin with the aficionados, 
> rather
> than with the "great unwashed". I will suggest that the public be 
> given
> the opportunity to vote at our next C&P Iris Society show. Thanks for
> contributing the idea, Steve, even if you may not agree with the
> outcome.

I didn't say that I disagreed with having a People's Choice Award, but I
do disagree that it should be used as a method of setting standards.  
After all, the judges do pick a Best of Show, and I do not always agree 
with the majority as to the best fish shown, but that is beside the 
point, and I do agree more often than I disagree <g>.

Many of the people who come to a fish show are not aware of the 
standards used, and I daresay that some of the exhibitors are not aware
(running for cover if there are any fish people out there who may 
recognize themselves here and take umbrage).  A People's Choice can get 
show attendees a greater feeling of joining the activity, and, perhaps, 
a better shot at the club getting them to at least come to a meeting and
perhaps becoming a member of the club.  It will also, as someone else 
pointed out, give them a chance to show the judges what they consider to
be a good fish.

I've also been on the talk circuit for several years and two fo my talks
concern shows.  One is Showing fish, where I walk people through 
preparing for a show, and what to look for in fish they plan to show, as
well as preparing them for the show, and another that shows what judges 
look for when judging a fish.  Perhaps some of the local iris societies 
can do this for their members as well, by having a qualified person 
cover those topics with regard to iris.  This will help promote an 
understanding of the members on what to show and how it will be judged 
when it is shown (and also make the life of the judges easier as they 
may not have to run for cover quite so fast after the results are 
announced <GG>.

While at this point I may not take my iris seriously, I do take fish 
seriously, and, at every opportunity, promote good fishkeeping and 
raising of good quality fish.  (Well, I hope I will raise good quality 
iris, but that remains to be seen.)

For aquariums, visit http://www.petsforum.com/was/
the Worcester Aquarium Society site.  Lots of links available.
For dogs, visit http://www.petsforum.com/ace/ to recieve
information about A.C.E. Agility Dog Club in Massachusetts.
Now in Virginia, Zone 6 or 7.

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index