articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: Judging - one person, three votes

Jeff Walters wrote about the People's Choice award:

I would hesitate to recommend opening all entries in the show
to a public ballot merely on account of the complexity and tediousness that
would be involved in  tabulating the ballots. Besides, the public would be
aware how the judges placed the entries in the main part of the show, and
possibly be influenced one way or another thereby,  whereas the way
seedlings are judged at our show, the public is unaware of the judges'
opinions regarding them."

Jeff, it doesn't have to be that hard.  We give everybody who wants to vote at 
our show (SFIS) a slip of paper, and when they have decided which one, they 
drop it in a gaily decorated box labelled "People's Choice Award".  There has 
never been any indication that knowledge of the judges' opinions has any 
bearing whatsoever on what our visitors choose.  They are not looking for the 
perfect specimen; they are looking for the prettiest, or the most striking.  
Anyway, you might try opening up your show for public vote--I think the 
results will surprise you greatly!

Barb in Santa Fe

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index