hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

RE: Abbreviations -- was Striking irises

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: RE: Abbreviations -- was Striking irises
  • From: "Mark, Maureen" <Mark.Maureen@fin.gc.ca>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 08:32:24 -0600 (MDT)

What's IMHO?

Maureen Mark
Ottawa, Canada

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	apearce@academy.net.au
[SMTP:apearce@academy.net.au]
		Sent:	Tuesday, September 16, 1997 7:45 PM
		To:	Mark, Maureen; Multiple recipients of list
		Subject:	Striking irises



		Dear all,
		           IMHO, some irises which create a strong
visual impact, and hence
		may be described as striking are not necessarily
beautiful.  So I would like
		to know if the ones that people have chosen are those
they regard as their
		three most strikingly beautiful irises.  

		Ann Pearce

		P.S. Sorry to be so pedantic.






 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index