Re: Anthurium watermaliense Hort. ex L.H. Bailey &
- Subject: Re: Anthurium watermaliense Hort. ex L.H. Bailey &
- From: E* <S*@exoticrainforest.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:28:07 -0600
Good question Jason! I'm trying to
learn the same answer but that had been my premise. Steve mossytrail wrote: Interesting. I would have assumed it was from someplace in Suriname, but apparently, not so. On the other hand, there are valid species named after where they were first noticed rather than from their native range. Like the greenhouse flatworm, Bipalium kewense. It is from the former French Indochina, but was first noticed by science in Kew Gardens. Question for ExoticRainforest: does the suffix Hort. always mean it was a horticultural name? Because I was under the impression that it applies to some valid species which, at the time they were named, had been in cultivation long enough that their wild origins were not remembered. Jason Hernandez Naturalist-at-Large |
begin:vcard fn:Steve Lucas n:Lucas;Steve email;internet:Steve@ExoticRainforest.com tel;cell:479-685-6738 x-mozilla-html:TRUE version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
- Next by Date: Re: Syngonium Podophyllum: better pix
- Next by thread: Re: Syngonium Podophyllum: better pix