RE: [Aroid-l] ID help
- Subject: RE: [Aroid-l] ID help
- From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" email@example.com
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:46:04 +0100
- Thread-index: AcYutgU7zzMFI8S7Sk6JI1Lnzhno/gAUuuDDABNWkSAAD9KaIA==
I sugegsted S. multiforus indeed but I do not agree with reason for the
infraspecific katharinae suggestion: S. multiflorus ssp. katharinae differs
from the typical subspecies and subsp. longitubus exclusively in sizes of a
number of floral characters. The spots on the "pseudo"-bulb are present in
the entire species.
Van: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
Namens Derek Burch
Verzonden: zaterdag 11 februari 2006 23:01
Aan: 'Discussion of aroids'
Onderwerp: RE: [Aroid-l] ID help
My vote would go to the person who suggested Scadoxus - that used to be
Haemanthus. .More specifically I think it is probably Scadoxus multiflorus
katherinae. All of my bulbs of this have that spotted look on glossy green
- more so than Eucomis or Drimiopsis. Derek
From: Andy Cabe [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 7:45 AM
To: Discussion of aroids
Subject: RE: [Aroid-l] ID help
Eucomis is a good guess. It may also be a scilla or drimiopsis.
From: email@example.com on behalf of Ken Mosher
Sent: Fri 2/10/2006 9:47 PM
To: Aroid list
Subject: [Aroid-l] ID help
I've had a request to help ID this bulb. The requester thought it was an
aroid, which I seem to doubt (are there any aroids that are true bulbs?).
I'm not sure if the two attached photos will come through to the list.
If not then anyone willing to try an ID can email me *privately*
(please) and I'll resend the photos directly to you.
(My impression is Eucomis sp)
Aroid-l mailing list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |