hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive



After all this discussion on pronunciation of Latin, doesn't anyone remember
that the Romans are DEAD?????? Then where did all these "authorities" got
their information???

Wilbertus Amorphophallophilus Tertius Magnus Blah-us, blah-us, blah-us (no
offensus to anyonus)

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: aroid-l@mobot.org [mailto:aroid-l@mobot.org]Namens Matyas Buzgo
> Verzonden: vrijdag 11 januari 2002 17:16
> Aan: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
> Onderwerp: Re: A-R-I-S-A-E-M-A
> Hye Latinophilics
> About Latin prononciations and the lack of standarts, try this
> Stearn, W. 1998. Botanical Latin, 4th Edition. Portland: Timber Press,
> ISBN 0-88192-321-4
> This is pretty much the standard for Botany
> Sadly Prof. Stearn left us last year.
> Or: a average Latin dictionary that contains phonetic letters. I use
> "Langenscheidt".
> Matyas

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index