hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Anthurium elegans taxonomy (Tom Croat)

  • Subject: Re: Anthurium elegans taxonomy (Tom Croat)
  • From: Jason Hernandez <jason.hernandez74@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:21:21 -0800 (PST)

You have to understand, too, that taxonomy will always be in flux.  If a taxonomist analyses a genus, and concludes that it is all correct just as it stands, then he will have nothing to publish.  So of course he will make changes.  That is why it is called "doing a revision" -- we can take for granted that changes will be made, since every taxonomist has a somewhat different species concept than everyone else. I doubt if anyone is purely a "lumper" or a "splitter;" rather, everyone has different ideas as to the relative importance of any given variable trait.

One of the strangest revisions I saw recently: I was looking at a list of flora of the Dominican Republic, and I saw that both Antirrhinum (snapdragons) and Linaria (toadflax) were listed under Plantaginaceae, not the Scrophulariaceae where I have been accustomed to seeing them.

Jason Hernandez

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:38:11 -0600
From: "Tom Croat" <Thomas.Croat@mobot.org>
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Anthurium elegans taxonomy
To: "Discussion of aroids" <aroid-l@www.gizmoworks.com>
    <F96F97BCBD9C1C46A99B1FDBD2644C2F0CAF7E@MBGMail01.mobot.org" href="mailto:F96F97BCBD9C1C46A99B1FDBD2644C2F0CAF7E@MBGMail01.mobot.org">F96F97BCBD9C1C46A99B1FDBD2644C2F0CAF7E@MBGMail01.mobot.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear David:  There is a mistake in the World Checklist. Anthurium elegans Engl. Is a synonym of A. pedatum (L) Schott.  In my copy of the checklist I have also included A. fortunatum Bunting as being equal to A. pedatum.



From: aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com] On Behalf Of david br?derbauer
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 3:01 AM
To: aroid-l@gizmoworks.com
Subject: [Aroid-l] Anthurium elegans taxonomy

Dear Aroiders,

I have received an inflorescence of Anthurium elegans from Josef Bogner some time ago. Now I checked it's taxonomic status on the Kew Monocot checklist. There, Anthurium elegans is listed as synonym for 2 species, Anthurium palmatum and A. fortunatum.
Josef Bogner says that his specimen is different from A. palmatum. So it could be Anthurium fortunatum - or is Anthurium elegans itself still a valid species?
Thanks for help!

David Broederbauer
University of Vienna, Austria

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/private/aroid-l/attachments/20120124/9e3d9277/attachment.htm


Aroid-L mailing list

End of Aroid-L Digest, Vol 90, Issue 10

Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement