hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: why scientists don't just give up the names battle

  • Subject: Re: why scientists don't just give up the names battle
  • From: StellrJ@aol.com
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:18:38 -0500 (CDT)

In a message dated Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:38:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Neil Carroll <zzamia@hargray.com> writes:

<< I collect plants for many different reasons. ...THe genes are only looking for a vessel and the people only
want something beautiful and/or interesting in their lives.>>

Am I the only one who takes an interest in certain plants BECAUSE of their names?  In the colud forest of Costa Rica grows a species of Peperomia whose binomial is P. hernandiifolia.  As you who remember my name may have guessed, it was the plant's name I found intriguing (as well as the peltate leaves).  And in seeking to learn the meaning of such a name, I was led to the unrelated genus Hernandia, in the family Hernandiaceae.  Again, it is the name I found intriguing; the name served as the gateway to learn more.

Jason Hernandez

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index