hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Alocasia zebrina reticulata

  • Subject: Re: Alocasia zebrina reticulata
  • From: "mossytrail" <mossytrail@hctc.com>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:00:13 -0800

> What a shame.  What will happen when there are no field
> botanists with the knowledge to recognize species in
> habitat?  I have taken young molecular taxonomists into
> the field and some of them really have no clue what they
> are looking at until you tell them.  At this rate, there
> will come a time when no field botanists will be able to
> lead them to their samples...which they send off to
> distant labs to analyze the relationships.
The other side is, those of us who ARE interested mainly in
the field side of things have to consider our options.  I am
starting grad school this fall.  Of the several schools I
applied to, the one which offered me a position was East
Carolina University, with a faculty member who mostly does
wetland biodiversity processes, i.e., ecology.  Yes, I
believe I will enjoy that, as it does relate to my
(admitteldly wide-ranging) interests; but whether I will be
able later to cross over into field taxonomy, who knows?

> The other problematic issue I see is that whole genomes
> are not analyzed, only sections that are not necessarily
> associated with known characteristics.  I see a great need
> for traditional botany...but the lure of molecular biology
> is hooking most of the young fish these days.

The young fish, as in every time, have to think about their
long-term prospects.  Molecular biology is often portrayed
as the wave of the future, and thus can *appear* to be a
better long-term prospect than traditional botany.  If you
want more young scientists to enter traditional botany,
including field taxonomy, they need to see how it can be an
equally good long-term prospect.  If they are not aware of
this, they are not making fully informed decisions.

Jason Hernandez
Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement