Indeed: How old are the aroids?
Peter and Sin Yeng,
Not only are your comments food for
thought, they are astonishing. You are hinting that aroids are as old as
any flowering plants, and you also believe that they are at least
as old as the earliest surviving angiosperm fossils.
Of course, we all know that if you want
to be a fossil it helps to have hard, durable parts that can be preserved
long enough to be covered in sediment and whatnot. I know from my own plants
that preservation of deceased material in warm, humid environments for
more than even a couple of hours is problematic. This means that the existential
history of many aroids and other life forms can have proceeded along for
eons under the fossil radar. Is this a way of teasing out some of the secret
history of the living world?
I am intrigued by your methodology.
This thread also meshes with our other recent discussion of the threatened-species
nature of taxonomists, since you seem to rely on inferences based on traditional
taxonomy. Maybe if young potential botanists think that there's more to
it than pressing and cataloging dry old plant parts they would more readily
sign up. Also, funding is nine parts show biz, so conjectures like this
might stir up a few bucks for deserving researchers.
Please keep me (us) updated on your
Aroid-L mailing list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |