Re: amorpho titanium pollen !!!
- Subject: Re: amorpho titanium pollen !!!
- From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:04:58 -0500 (CDT)
Well, even in Amorphophallus there are some species very close in morphology
and even I wonder of they are rightly separated. Hybridising that stuff
would cloud the issue even more. I think I better reduce them as soon as
possible and then "hybridising" them is no fun anymore......
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Iles <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L <email@example.com>
Sent: donderdag 21 juni 2001 22:11
Subject: Re: amorpho titanium pollen !!!
> I'll go away and try to sort the mess in the simple group I chose to keep.
> Then scans of the defined plants can be put up on the Web for Reference.
> Most cultivar "names" are illegitimate, except those direct from tissue
> culture. By the time they're in "Nurseries" & Florists, they have lots
> aliases & if they cross the pond by the time they get there, forged
> passports. No wonder they won't let 'em out of Countries where they're in
> hiding. It seems that every Spath cultivar that ever been born has had
> original name changed by its successions of owners. In comparison, the
> new wave of Amorphophallod miscagenators are only just beginning their
> cultural diversifying. It seems even at this stage that in practice you
> surprisingly unsure of species?