hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Alocasia araceae

Surely there is a simple explanation - the catalogue maker is not too
familiar with scientific nomenclature, and is just saying "Alocasia
(Araceae)" - giving the family name and not committing to any further i.d.
than the genus of the plant. [Note that I am refraining from any snotty
comment about people's unwillingness to become comfortable with scientific
names.] derek
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dany Hervelle" <bs246466@skynet.be>
To: "Multiple recipients of list AROID-L" <aroid-l@mobot.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: Alocasia araceae

> Hello Gabe and list!
> I don't know nothing about alocasia araceae,but if someone know i may be
> really happy
> to know too.Is this a new species or a new variety?
> Regards to all
> Dany

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index