hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Philodendron santa leopoldina

  • Subject: Re: Philodendron santa leopoldina
  • From: StellrJ@aol.com
  • Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:35:25 -0600 (CST)

In a message dated Sun, 4 Nov 2001 10:27:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, "Julius Boos" <ju-bo@email.msn.com> writes:

>   Perhaps in the future some seed can be donated to a person in Brazil 
>   where they can be grown and then re-introduced back into the 
>   wild??

While I am all for reintroductions, this presupposes a habitat in which to reintroduce.  If a plant becomes extinct, it is generally caused by lack of habitat in the first place.  So, the first priority should be to restore or protect habitat, to prevent the extinction, and to provide a place for reintroduction.  Consider an example from North America: the tree Franklinia alatamaha, which has been extinct in the wild for over 200 years, but still exists in cultivation.  Why have there been no reintroductions?  Probably there are no suitable sites for reintroduction.  This despite the fact that Georgia has a State Park named after this tree.

Jason Hernandez

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index