hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Colocasia antiquorum

  • Subject: Re: Colocasia antiquorum
  • From: Peter Boyce <phymatarum@gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 06:28:32 +0800

Hi George,

I think Steve may have got the wrong end of the stick - the problem isn't so much that antiquorum is a unique species but that it cannot be used as the name for aunique species - he next available name for which is fontanesii.Â


On 2 September 2014 13:30, George Yao <geoyao@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Aroiders,

In his webpage on Colocasia esculenta in his "TheÂExotic Rainforest" website, the late Steve Lucas pointed out that "A new paper is now in the process of being published that will establish thatÂColocasia antiquorumÂis a unique species.â Has the mentioned paper been published yet?

George Yao

Aroid-L mailing list

Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement