hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

SLUG: The Importance of Wearing Different Hats for Different Jobs

  • Subject: [cg] SLUG: The Importance of Wearing Different Hats for Different Jobs
  • From: Adam36055@aol.com
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:08:25 EDT


The old line is that if you want to get something done, you give it to someone busy to do. It's amazing how much gets done by a relatively few people, because they multi-task.  Folks who are community gardeners are often involved in civic issues, political campaigns, religious organizations, soup kitchens/food banks, as well as the all-important "day job" that puts food on the table and buys the kids new shoes.  But you have to remember to wear "different hats" because the folks around you might get confused - heck, you might get confused too!

SLUG screwed up: A not-for-profit organization that depends on city and private funding sources for its job development and community gardening program can't be an open political player - and certainly not use its offices as a political campaign office. It's a prime case of biting the hand that feeds you, and was patently illegal.  It's a case of a program's administrators thinking they can do what they want with the organization's resources, without looking carefully at their charter.  Honesly friends, I can't imagine what SLUG was thinking, telling their employees to not only support but also work as SLUG folks for a political candidate.  A major mistake, and thankfully, a rare one.  

Folks who run community gardening programs and gardens around here in NYC are political players, members of community boards, belong to political clubs, and support candidates - however they do this as PRIVATE CITIZENS, wearing different hats. 

A community gardening program or garden should never  support or endorse  a candidate as an community gardening organization. As individuals, certainly - as members of other political organizations, sure - but not as a community gardening organization....we depend on the good will of legislators in land use matters, for one thing.

In an election, there are winners and losers, and a 50% chance of losing the good will of your municipal elected officials by opposing them in an election

Obviously they will talk to their friends and co-workers about their different projects, but there is a definate separation between the activities - and unfortunately SLUG managers abused their organization charter to do this - a major screw up.

Adam Honigman
Clinton Community Garden 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index