hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Daffodil question

In a message dated 04/12/2004 6:30:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
kmrsy@comcast.net writes:

> Wm Backhouse of county
> Durham raised daffodils from 1856 yielding cultivars 'Emperor, 'Empress',
> 'Weardale Perfection', and 'W.P.Milner', and "the first two can still be
> found growing in parks and gardens today, and looking well."

Would this Backhouse have produced the old 'Mrs. R. O. Backhouse' that is 
still one of my favorite pinks?

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement