RE: now new version of old plants- was need your thoughts on some plants please.
- To: g*@hort.net
- Subject: RE: [CHAT] now new version of old plants- was need your thoughts on some plants please.
- From: "Donna" g*@sbcglobal.net
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:24:45 -0500
- In-reply-to: 1b0ea3bc8f628885779c6526c01340d2@verizon.net
Hum-- aside from a small difference in the look of the plant... isn't the
theory that the new versions are either- hardier, disease resistant, no
mildew, and other claims to get us to buy them?
Donna
>
> The only plants we have interest in here that are victims of "NEWER,
> BETTER" marketing ploys are caladiums and tomatoes. Unless I'm
> forgetting some--a distinct possibility--I can't think of any others
> that have new models, even every four or five years.
>
> And I agree with Ceres, "new is not necessarily better" for these two
> plants at least, and I'll take it one observation farther--the new
> introductions may not even be as good as what we now have or had last
> year. I don't think it's always sentimentality that prods us to prefer
> heirlooms; sometimes it's performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index