RE: The taxonomists are at it again!

---

• To: g*@hort.net
• Subject: RE: [CHAT] The taxonomists are at it again!
• From: "Donna " j*@prairieinet.net
• Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 22:49:06 -0500
• In-reply-to: 003701c35c86$6bf07680$05ec3544@newhvn01.in.comcast.net

But I think we are going to have to add a column to all the databases...
as in --
Currently, was, common.... gees......:)

And not being argumentive (is that a word?), agree that dna is the only
real way to tell. Problem is the botanical/latin names are getting as
confusing as the common names. 

Donna


> 
> I hate to be odd man out here, but it's not a popularity poll.
Changes in
> taxonomy are slow - though much has occurred in the past decade.  They
> don't
> change the names just for fun or to cause trouble.  It's done for
> accuracy.
> 
> Kitty

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

• References:
  • Re: The taxonomists are at it again!
    • From: "K*"

• Prev by Date: Re: Lavender source
• Next by Date: RE: which list is which
• Previous by thread: Re: The taxonomists are at it again!
• Next by thread: WOT : The South