Re: NOW photography

there was a good piece in the ny times about 2 months ago that compared and evaluated then-available models that sold for $350 [as i recall} or more. it's probably available in their archives for a couple of bucks. it would be worth reading, i think, because there were trade offs one needs to consider when choosing.

it made me realize that even the best one wasn't the best one, if you know what i mean.


At 03:33 PM 12/22/02 -0500, you wrote:
Donna wrote:

Does anyone on this list use one of the high end digital cameras? I am
looking into buying one for the company I work for. The current list of
possible ones:
Canon EOS D60
Fuji S2 Pro
Nikon D100
Nikon D1X

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I bought a Canon G2 which isn't quite top of the line, but
were money no object, any of the above plus the high-end Olympus
which has an 8 or 10 X optical zoom would be first rate. Company plan
to do any telephoto work or photography at a distance ?
One thing to note about the list above: the Canon and at least one
if not both the Nikons base price is for the case and works alone,
lens(es) come extra. If you/company already _has_ a 35mm Canon EOS
optical camera, you can use existing lenses on the digital version.
-jrf
--
Jim Fisher
Vienna, Virginia USA
38.9 N 77.2 W
USDA Zone 7
Max. 105 F [37 C], Min. -0 F [-17 C]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

jsinger@igc.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index