Re: Iraq
- To: <g*@hort.net>
- Subject: Re: [CHAT] Iraq
- From: &* <k*@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:54:23 -0500
- References: <11b.2d95afb2.2d51548f@aol.com>
$200 struck me as odd too Ceres. I wouldn't know where to check, but I
would think it must be more than that. It's not even a week's pay.
Interesting comparison with 9/11.
Kitty
----- Original Message -----
From: <Cersgarden@aol.com>
To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [CHAT] Iraq
> In a message dated 2/3/04 11:56:50 AM, TeichFlora@aol.com writes:
>
> << Just as a bit of info for those that aren't aware......a family of a
> fallen
> soldier in Iraq now gets a measly $200 since it is no longer considered a
> "war". >>
>
> Regardless of rank, military division, overseas or stateside duty?
However
> about funeral expenses, assistance in the planning etc? Are the bodies
still
> escourted home by military? I was sure my son had life insurance in the
early
> 90s.
> Doesn't compare to the 9/11 victims which I could not believe the
> compensation the families rcd there. If the victims died on the way to
work by a bolt of
> lighting or drove their car into a wall, what would the payout be? How
can
> the government be responsible for such a catastrophe? Yet they take
minimum
> responsibility for their employees (military)?
> Ceres
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
> http://www.hort.net/funds/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
http://www.hort.net/funds/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index