gardenchat@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Re: Old vs. New
- From: J* S* <i*@q.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:02:54 -0800
My thought when I read the article was "much ado about nothing." Unfortunately, it's like too many about-gardening articles. Which is why long ago (about the time when Organic Gardening went slick) I quit reading any of the so-called gardening writers except Barbara Damrosch and a couple of others (Vern Nelson, for one), and ditched my subscriptions to the dead-tree marketers. There are 40 million poor persons in the United States. Why? On Feb 29, 2012, at 7:11 AM, TeichFauna@aol.com wrote: > I'm posting this to Gardenchat since it might become an interesting > discussion point suitable for gardenchat ....no? > > I found the article very interesting.....unlike Kitty, I didn't get that > strong vibe of younger men vs. middle age women type thing. Yes there was > that between the writer and the guy that posted the tweet, however, gender > and age differences aside.......what I found interesting was how gardeners > have taken up "camps". This is something that I have found here in > Texas....and was surprised to read was happening in other regions as well. > Perhaps this has always been the case, I don't know. I'm sure since the 60's > there have been those that use chemicals, those that are totally organic, > and those in the middle. Unlike was stated, I don't find that the young are > more organic than the older gardeners. I do wonder if, as the article > questioned, if it is along political lines.......with the organics and natives > anyway. Are those on the right less concerned about environment, using > more chemicals, having lawns, etc. and those on the left more organic, > native, etc.??? And as Kitty says, as we get older, less energetic......go with > whatever works best and is easiest? I do remember in my earlier gardening > years trying very hard to only garden one way or the other (totally > organic, totally native), less compromising, and found that it was far too much > effort. > > I don't see sparks fly between the organic and non-organic groups as much > as I do between the native purists and the rest of the gardening population, > including commercial, govt, etc. I did find it very interesting that > there was mention of areas in the subdivisions being natural and native, and > others that were more manicured and tailored. One thing that I've found > here is that the Home Owners Associations frown heavily on native or > natural....especially when it is not what they would consider maintained. Neither > of which will even consider a compromise, thus never resolving anything. > The native folks can't fathom that a native could be considered an > invasive, simply because it is native......and the HOA's can't fathom the thought > that not all natives are weedy. Again, I stand somewhere in the > middle.....and successfully have a mixture of both native and non-native (all > non-invasive) with no complaints from the HOA, but plenty from my purist > friends. > > Among gardening clubs, MG's, societies, etc. here, for a time being (in the > 80s, I was told) many of the groups were dying out due to the fact that > all the members were older, and no new blood (so to speak) was coming in. > The majority of the members were those that had been members for many many > years. This is still true for one or two. Gardening groups in general were > considered social, rather than interest groups. However, it seems that > since the Internet, there has been a renewed interest, dismissing the stigma > that plants and gardening are only for the old, and a change in societies > (anyway) toward being interest groups with furthering education rather than > social. Most groups (especially the individual plant societies) have > seen more young members in their late teens and twenties (apartment dwellers) > become interested and joining. I do notice that the younger generation > tends to specialize more, I did too, having a cactus collection as early as > I can remember, thinking that vegetable and flower gardening was boring, > done by the "older generation". Still no increase in members in the child > rearing age group, unless they are childless. The greatest numbers are > those in ages 40 and up, with many new members. I find that among the > Societes that men tend to specialize more than women. Women tend to enjoy > different types of gardening (plants) more or less equally. Men on the other > hand, tend to pick one or two, and stick with that almost exclusively. Also I > find that in garden clubs most members are female, however among the > specific plant societies, roughly half of the members are men. In the local > chapters of the Cactus & Succulent Society and the Bonsai Society the > majority are men. > > I have noticed the resurgence of vegetable and edible gardening in recent > years.....especially among the survivalists groups, could be along > political lines or economics there too, perhaps. I don't think it is gender or > age specific to garden for food, beauty, etc. however it tends to be those > with homes that do so more. Except that there are trends, and that the > trend (here anyway) to plant rows and rows of annuals every season vs. a more > natural look (with perennials instead) to be outdated, and seldom seen > anymore. Economics and climate has had a lot to do with that, and the increase > in rain gardens and sustainable gardening as well, in Texas. Not everyone > has the same amount of space, time, interest level, addiction, or passion > regardless of gender/age.....but among the die hard gardeners....... > although one might become less energetic, I find that the passion is the last to > fade away. > > Noreen > zone 9 > Texas Gulf Coast > > > In a message dated 2/28/2012 8:02:08 PM Central Standard Time, > lindsey@mallorn.com writes: > > http://www.scrippsnews.com/content/growing-divide-taking-root-garden-world > > Basically, it talks about 'old' vs. 'new' gardeners and their differing > viewpoints. > > > > > > > In a message dated 2/28/2012 8:56:28 PM Central Standard Time, > kmrsy@comcast.net writes: > > Oh wow, what a can of worm castings! > I see several attitudes in this controversy. A lot of middle-aged woman > were the ones growing organic veggies in communes in the 60s. It's more a > matter of been there, done that. When I began gardening in my very late > 30s > I was all into the organic attitude. I was also into every free the > dolphins sort of thing too. OK, I still am, but I'm just less energetic > about it. My garden is my calm spot, not my demonstration place. Organic > is nice, but I just don't want to dedicate my life to it so I do take > short > cuts. Ask one of today's 25 yr old gardeners 30 years from now how THEY > feel about it. Some will stick with it, but the vast majority will make > some > changes. > > And did anyone pick up on the specificity of the genders depicted for the > age groups? In this particular article the older gardeners were women and > > the younger were men. They didn't touch on differences between younger vs > older female gardeners. I've noticed similar attitudes in men in my age > group as were depicted in the younger men. Most men are more practical, > there needs to be a productive outcome, hence, food. When it comes to > ornamentals most men seem more comfortable in the realm of trees, shrubs, > and lawns (present company excepted) > > The young guy wrote, "A lot of what's out there is about growing > ornamentals. It was targeted to people with a lot of land and a lot of > money." Well, I have to agree with him and I'm a middle aged woman. Fine > Gardening annoyed the heck outa me with several articles, declaring that > all > their featured gardens were DIY. They said this woman converted a blank 2 > > acre landscape in 18 months all on her own. All on her own checkbook, > maybe! SHE didn't put in those 30 foot trees with those manicured hands. > > But I digress. I do think we need to think outside the compost bin. Make > the site desirable to all kinds of gardeners. > > > Kitty > neIN, Zone 5 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the > message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
- References:
- Re: Old vs. New
- From: T*
- Re: Old vs. New
- Prev by Date: Re: Old vs. New
- Previous by thread: Re: Old vs. New