hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: terms/hollyhock??

Can't answer that.  As you probably noticed, traffic has been reduced markedly
here in the last few days.  Hopefully when Marge or Jim or some of the more
experienced gardeners check in they'll have an answer for you.  

On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:42:06 -0500 (EST) Melody <mhobertm@excite.com> wrote:

> Kitty: Okay, so I'm willing to be open to the
> possibility of it being a
> fat root...but do you, or anyone else, think
> it's possible for a root to
> lie dormant in the ground for such a long time
> (years)?
> Melody, IA (Z 5/4)
> "The most beautiful thing we can experience is
> the mysterious."    
> --Albert Einstein --- On Fri 01/10, Kitty <
> kmrsy@earthlink.net >
> wrote:From: Kitty [mailto:
> kmrsy@earthlink.net]To:
> gardenchat@hort.netDate: Fri, 10 Jan 2003
> 08:33:20 -0800Subject: Re:
> [CHAT] terms/hollyhock??I've had tobacco and
> Amaranth plants with big
> roots like that. I've nevergrown hollyhocks so
> I can't say for sure,
> but....When I've checked plants in reference
> materials, they will be
> decribed asrhizomatous if indeed they have
> rhizomes. If they don't have
> rhizomes,tubers, bulbs, tuberous roots, or some
> other storage system,
> nothing ismentioned other than perennial,
> biennial, etc.When I look up
> Alcea in Botanica (which is what I have at
> work) nothing ismentioned. So
> I tried something else: Try Googling
> "Alcea rhizome"
> or"Hollyhock rhizome". I could not
> find a single entry that
> contained the twowords next to each
> other.Sounds like a fat root to
> me.KittyOn Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:17:40 -0500
> (EST) Melody
> <mhobertm@excite.com> wrote:> Kitty:
> Other than tree roots,
> I've never seen a> root this big...it>
> literally was over a foot
> long, about 4 inches> in diameter at its>
> midpoint, and weighed
> several pounds...it was> massive. Also,
> without> digging it up
> again, I don't think I can answer> about new
> plants arising> at
> points along the "rhizome'" (if
> that's what> it is)...I can
> tell you> that when it puts out stalks and
> leaves and> then
> flowers, it's always in> the same spot where
> I buried it...but it
> does> self-seed pretty> prolifically so
> now I have hollyhocks
> growing> up to about 10 feet away> from
> where I buried the
> original as well as> around the corner of
> the> house, about fifty
> feet away (i'm still trying> to figure that
> out!)> > >
> Melody, IA (Z 5/4)> > "The most
> beautiful thing we can
> experience is> the mysterious." >
> --Albert Einstein> >
> On Fri 01/10, Kitty <
> kmrsy@earthlink.net> > wrote:From:
> Kitty> [mailto: kmrsy@earthlink.net]To:>
> gardenchat@hort.n
> etDate: Fri, 10 Jan> 2003 07:55:15
> -0800Subject: Re: [CHAT]>
> terms/hollyhock??Melody, Are you> sure it's
> not just a fat root
> traveling> horizontally? Do new
> plantsarise> at other places along
> this rhizome?> > >

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement